Let's Make it Official

NVDA Steals the Marketcap Crown On It's Meteoric Rise

Hi everyone,

Five years ago, Nvidia was barely in the top 40 largest companies in the S&P 500.

This week, it became number one.

You’ve probably heard the saying, “Data is the new oil.” Well… Nvidia’s market is worth more than the entire US Oil & Gas industry combined.

Source: @KobeisiiLetter, x.com

Additionally, Nvidia has contributed 40% of all gains in the Nasdaq so far this year. At one point in late April, it contributed almost all of Nasdaq’s gains for the entire year.

Source: Kelvin Mu, Translink Capital, LinkedIn

As the AI-fueled craze marches on, it’s becoming difficult to poke holes in this juggernaut. Nearly every part of the supply chain (Memory, Equipment, Networking) indicates that there will be increasing purchases of Nvidia’s chips.

Core customers are strong, and diversification continues. Megacaps continue ramping CAPEX projections, while those outside the major cloud players also increase spending. Only 40% of revenue now comes from megacap players vs. 50% + before.

But how long can this last?

We know that CAPEX spending cycles don’t happen forever. Nvidia’s revenue is largely concentrated around its core data center GPU product. While this growth shows no sign of slowing over the short term, a stronger long-term narrative is needed to tell a better story.

The focus has shifted here over the last couple of weeks. Nvidia has been refocusing its narrative around an enduring platform play.

CEO Jensen Huang appears to be creating moats around the core parts of his business. He is doing this across three core pillars: 1) Software (CUDA), 2) Networking, and 3) Proprietary Cloud.

The first part of this moat is the CUDA software stack. CUDA has become the standard for GPU computing, creating a vast ecosystem of developers, software, and applications optimized specifically for Nvidia GPUs. CUDA has optimized performance, developer tools and support, and industry-wide adoption, which creates ecosystem lock-in. 

The second part of the moat is the networking side, which is required to operate and build a full-rack server. This year, Nvidia plans to design and procure the materials for servers and racks holding the GB200 chips before handing them off to server manufacturers that build and sell them. This verticalization would hurt companies like Dell, HPE, and Supermicro. In addition, Microsoft would have even less pricing power if Nvidia was in charge of the complete configuration. Microsoft has successfully pushed back on this, but they must play nice with Nvidia to get GPU allocation.

The final part of the moat is moving into the cloud. As highlighted in an article in The Information, Nvidia is also starting to move laterally to providing its own cloud service:

“Nvidia has begun selling more software to AI developers and a year ago even set up its own server rental business, DGX Cloud. That move put it directly into competition with its biggest customers—cloud providers such as Microsoft and AWS. Bizarrely enough, DGX Cloud operates on clusters of Nvidia-powered servers that it leases from those cloud providers. Nvidia then rents the servers to its own customers at a higher cost, promising them better computing performance.”

The Information “Nvidia’s Jensen Huang Is on Top of the World. So Why Is He Worried?” By Anissa Gardizzy and Qianer Liu (June 18, 2024)

While we still have to see how this move into the cloud plays out, Nvidia seems to be keeping many competitive avenues open to capture even more of the ecosystem.

The cloud providers aren’t going down without a fight. They are starting to diversify even more to try to limit Nvidia’s dominance. They do this by purchasing more from AMD and building custom silicon to limit Nvidia’s pricing power.

However, the pricing power remains with Nvidia simply because their tech is too good to go anywhere else. In their most recent quarter, they printed 53% free cash flow margins, with estimates remaining at a rate of 50% over the coming two fiscal years. In fact, Free cash flow estimates of $83B ending CY25 are higher than estimates for Microsoft’s CY25 FCF of $79B.

Since Nvidia just de-throned Microsoft, let’s hold them up side by side:

Nvidia:

Source: Bloomberg

Microsoft:

Who are you picking?

For those looking for daily news updates every morning, consider subscribing to our FREE daily newsletter, the GRIT Flagship! Daily news and insights on stocks, crypto, and finance. 📩

Cheers,

The GRIT Alpha Team

The author of this newsletter owns a position in Microsoft (MSFT), Nvidia (NVDA), Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD), Google (GOOG), and Amazon (AMZN) in their portfolio or in the funds they manage. There is no guarantee that the author will maintain such a position in the future.

Grit is a publisher of financial information, not an investment advisor. Grit does not provide personalized or individualized investment advice or information that is tailored to the needs of any particular recipient. Grit does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information provided in this page. All statements and expressions herein are the sole opinion of the author or paid advertiser.

THE INFORMATION CONTAINED ON THIS WEBSITE IS NOT AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUED AS INVESTMENT ADVICE, AND DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE AND DOES NOT EXPRESS ANY OPINION AS TO THE PRICE AT WHICH THE SECURITIES OF ANY COMPANY MAY TRADE AT ANY TIME. THE INFORMATION AND OPINIONS PROVIDED HEREIN SHOULD NOT BE TAKEN AS SPECIFIC ADVICE ON THE MERITS OF ANY INVESTMENT DECISION. INVESTORS SHOULD MAKE THEIR OWN INVESTIGATION AND DECISIONS REGARDING THE PROSPECTS OF ANY COMPANY DISCUSSED HEREIN BASED ON SUCH INVESTORS’ OWN REVIEW OF PUBLICLY AVAILABLE INFORMATION AND SHOULD NOT RELY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN. INVESTORS SHOULD OBTAIN INDIVIDUAL INVESTMENT ADVICE BASED ON THEIR OWN CIRCUMSTANCES BEFORE MAKING AN INVESTMENT DECISION

No statement or expression of opinion, or any other matter herein, directly or indirectly, is an offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell the securities or financial instruments mentioned.

The author, publisher or insiders of the publisher may currently have long or short positions in the securities of the companies mentioned herein, or may have such a position in the future (and therefore may profit from fluctuations in the trading price of the securities). To the extent such persons do have such positions, there is no guarantee that such persons will maintain such positions.

Any projections, market outlooks or estimates herein are forward looking statements and are inherently unreliable. They are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed to be indicative of the actual events that will occur. Other events that were not taken into account may occur and may significantly affect the returns or performance of the securities discussed herein. The information provided herein is based on matters as they exist as of the date of preparation and not as of any future date, and Grit undertakes no obligation to correct, update or revise the information in this document or to otherwise provide any additional material.

Grit does not accept any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss howsoever arising, directly or indirectly, from any use of the information contained herein.

By using the Site or any related social media account, you are indicating your consent and agreement to this disclaimer and our terms of use. Unauthorized reproduction of this newsletter or its contents by photocopy, facsimile or any other means is illegal and punishable by law.

Grit publishes content through Beehiiv, an email newsletter platform and operates the websites Gritcap.io and Get-versed.io and and social media accounts (including but not limited to): Instagram, Twitter, Linkedin, TikTok, YouTube, SnapChat, Facebook and Threads. By accessing Grit’s content, you agree to be bound by the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, in effect at the time you access this website or any page thereof or any of Grit’s content. The Terms of Use and Privacy Policy may be amended from time to time. Nothing on this website or Grit constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or subscribe for, any securities to any person in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation is against the law or to anyone to whom it is unlawful to make such offer or solicitation. Grit is not an underwriter, broker-dealer, Title III crowdfunding portal or a valuation service and does not engage in any activities requiring any such registration. Grit does not provide advice on investments or structure transactions. Offerings made under Regulation A under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act") are available to U.S. investors ONLY who are “accredited investors” as defined by Rule 501 of Regulation D under the Securities Act well as non-accredited investors, who are subject to certain investment limitations as set forth in Regulation A under the Securities Act. In order to invest in Regulation A offerings, investors may be asked to fill out a certification and provide necessary documentation as proof of your income and/or net worth to verify that you are qualified to invest in offerings posted on this website. All securities listed on this site are being offered by, and all information included on this site is the responsibility of, the applicable issuer of such securities. Grit does not verify the adequacy, accuracy or completeness of any information. Neither Grit nor any of its officers, directors, agents and employees makes any warranty, express or implied, of any kind whatsoever related to the adequacy, accuracy, valuations of securities or completeness of any information on this site or the use of information on this site. Neither Grit nor any of its directors, officers, employees, representatives, affiliates or agents shall have any liability whatsoever arising from any error or incompleteness of fact, or lack of care in the preparation of, any of the materials posted on this website. Investing in securities, especially those issued by start-up companies, involves substantial risk. investors should be able to bear the loss of their entire investment and should make their own determination of whether or not to make any investment based on their own independent evaluation and analysis.

If you have any questions please contact us at [email protected]